đ And all of them were solved to my satisfaction.
There is no Jira-like open bug-tracking, but support is responsive and deals with your problems mostly in a matter of days â and I had a few more issues with my naive approach to diagrams, trust me. My creed is ânothing changes if nothing is saidâ, so I went on their support page and told them. It seemed to me like no user before me ever tried to work with gradient fills before. When I started to draw class diagrams I was satisfied with overall quality (as expected) but some features were surprisingly⊠well⊠indigested.
#VISUAL PARADIGM UML REVIEW LICENSE#
It all started with a bit of communication with the company about their one year support policy (simply put, without support you can get fixes, but no version upgrade, if I understand it correctly) and after that I bought one license with one-year support plan. I went for the Modeler Edition as I needed mostly just diagrams and nothing sophisticated behind. I tried VP before (a few years actually), it impressed me then, and it impressed me the second time again.outputs look really nice compared to free alternatives (just like Sparx does, and both produce way nicer diagrams than Rational),.
I knew Sparx Enterprise Architect a bit already and wanted to try something new (plus the lowest edition price was a bit lower),.Things may have been improved in further versions.ÄȘfter my previous fast-scan through a few UML tools I decided to try Visual Paradigm for UML for the following reasons: Edit : This post applies to version VP10.
0 kommentar(er)
